The numbers on the outer and inner scales represent multiples of 10 of the values shown.In the center of the rotating portion are three "holes" (windows) used to compute corrected (true) altitude, density altitude, and true airspeed.This arrow is used as a reference to a rate, such as knots (nautical miles per hour) or gallons per hour.The number "60" on the inner scale has been replaced with a triangular-shaped arrow, referred to as the Index ( ).The inner scale is used to represent time, calibrated or indicated airspeed, and calibrated or indicated altitude, depending on the calculation being performed.The numbers on the edge of the rotating portion are referred to as the INNER SCALE in this document.
#Air navigation computer simulator
Wilhelm reported reactions of airline crews to full-mission simulator scenarios and noted that aircrews rated the realism of the scenarios very highly. Specifically, such research needs to focus on the generalizability of CRM skills across various levels of simulator fidelity. Nonetheless, given the small number of aircrews, these data should only be considered preliminary, and future research must continue to address the issue of simulator comparability.
The helicopter pilots indicated that training on the tabletop system was acceptable, appropriate for training CRM skills, and challenging. Their responses were positive and were similar for the two different simulators. Reactions of the subjects to the two scenarios were collected. Twelve crews consisting of pilot and copilot flew two similar mission scenarios, one on the tabletop system and the other in an operational flight trainer with visuals and a 6 degree-of-motion system.
#Air navigation computer software
The hardware used was as described above (except for the use of joysticks instead of yokes) and the software program used was an off-the-shelf helicopter simulation, GUNSHIP. Some preliminary data that address these issues were collected from a group of military helicopter pilots. There are two issues of immediate concern for the use of this system: the generalizability of the system to other aviation communities and the comparability of the system with operational-flight trainers. Acceptance was found by aviators of all experience levels. Aircrews seemed to appreciate the training value of the system and became engaged in its scenarios. Reactions of pilots participating in this research indicated that the use of computer games with carefully designed scenarios can be an acceptable means of training CRM skills. These three qualities suggest possible value as a training medium, even though existing aviation game software has not been designed specifically for training or crew interactions. Computer games have the capacity to engage the player, are inexpensive, and are readily available.
0 kommentar(er)
